chuggin
Posts: 139
Joined: 2/7/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Houred Out While there are strong opinions on several sides of this issue that will probably disagree with my characterization of the issue(s), here is the situation summary IMHO: PSTR has grown to over 300 members. A vast majority of those members (at least 260) join PSTR only to ride in our Short Course series. The rest of the membership consists of two groups, I will label them the EO Enduro-only riders (~10 members) and MHS the More Hare-Scrambles-oriented (~30 members who primarily ride HS, occasional enduros, or just work PSTR events). With PSTR putting on upwards of 20+ events a year including NETRA hare scrambles, kids events, a NETRA enduro, Poker Runs, our Short Course series, etc.; there is a lot of work to do. There is little debate that the MHS group does at least 98% of the work behind the club. The by-law change to require a member to reach a threshold of PSTR work points was driven from two concerns held by the MHS group: 1) The Short Course riders currently have full voting rights, and with their vast numbers could show up en masse to any meeting and take over the club. 2) Most of the EO group only appear at a PSTR gathering (including our twice-monthly meetings) once a year for a few hours on Enduro Day to work a check and get their required NETRA Enduro Series work credit. Issue #2 above came to a head at a recent club meeting when a member of the MHS group submitted a motion to not have a PSTR enduro this year due to the hassle and low rider turnout. The EO group (which does have some very long term PSTR members in it who in the past contributed a lot) objected and a passionate debate erupted over whether someone who (for whatever reason) currently contributes very little if anything to the club should have the same rights as someone who - at minimum - shows up to work a few events and attends a few meetings a year. Should be an interesting meeting... So you fear the members taking over the club? I hope you realize your “MHS” took over the club and now feels threatened of losing your control. Issue #2 After the “MHS” talked amongst yourselves, it decided without a vote (check the minutes of the meetings if you like) to break the past practice of 30 years PSTR putting on an enduro. Then proceeded to put in the news letter the enduro is cancelled and it is because the enduro guys are lazy. You failed to advertise and offer the change to the membership to vote on. (Afraid of a vote?) The enduro riders took offense and showed up at the following meeting (12/1/09) and had to justify ourselves and enlighten the “MHS” to how much we have done and still do for the club. The following is what scares you into this proposed bylaw. After the voice of reason (John Rantuccio) spoke, a vote was taken and the enduro was put back on the schedule. The enduro riders had enough members in attendance. That scared you. The Netra sanctioning meeting was only a few days away. We asked the club to write us the $100 check to bring to the sanctioning meeting to hold our enduro date. The vice president, who was chairing this meeting refused and said he doesn’t agree with it. (Even after a vote by the members?) Geoff W. took his own money and wrote the check to NETRA. These are the (unabridged) minutes. Matt Ostiguy
|